

In a sector where every kilowatt-hour counts, the operation and maintenance (O&M) of solar photovoltaic plants has become a strategic activity. It’s no longer enough to simply keep installations running—today, the challenge lies in ensuring maximum performance, reliability, and profitability. In this context, key performance indicators (KPIs). have emerged as essential tools for assessing service quality, optimizing processes, and making decisions based on real, actionable data. KPIs make it possible to transform technical and operational performance into measurable, comparable, and actionable figures. Through them, asset owners and operators can identify inefficiencies, detect deviations from performance contracts, and justify investments in maintenance, repowering, or digitalization. But which KPIs really matter in solar O&M?
KPIs make it possible to transform technical and operational performance into measurable, comparable, and actionable figures. Through them, asset owners and operators can identify inefficiencies, detect deviations from performance contracts, and justify investments in maintenance, repowering, or digitalization. But which KPIs really matter in solar O&M?
One of the most widely used indicators in the solar industry is the Performance Ratio (PR), which expresses the overall efficiency of a photovoltaic plant. It accounts for not just the solar irradiance received, but also losses due to temperature, soiling, degradation, electrical faults, and more.
This KPI is calculated as the ratio between the actual energy produced and the theoretical energy available under standard conditions. A PR between 85% and 90% is considered acceptable for well-designed and well-maintained plants, though real values vary depending on climate, module technology, and O&M quality.
PR is particularly useful because it allows comparison between plants of different sizes and locations, and above all, helps determine whether actual output aligns with design expectations and contractual obligations.
Another critical KPI is plant availability, which measures the time that equipment is operational and connected to the grid. Availability above 99% is typical in well-managed plants, but even small drops can result in significant financial losses.
There are different ways to measure availability: technical availability (when the system is running and functional) and contractual availability, which focuses on specific equipment defined in the O&M agreement. This KPI is closely tied to SLA (Service Level Agreement) contracts, where penalties may apply if minimum thresholds aren’t met.
A more detailed analysis may categorize availability losses by cause: inverter faults, DC combiner issues, grid disconnections, or scheduled maintenance.
In an increasingly competitive market, the speed with which an O&M company detects and resolves faults has become a key differentiator. Two KPIs are central here:
MTTR (Mean Time to Repair): the average time from fault detection to resolution.
MTTD (Mean Time to Detect): the average time between a fault occurring and being identified.
Both indicators help assess operational efficiency and a company’s ability to minimize energy losses. The shorter these times, the more energy recovered and the smaller the economic impact.
Real-time monitoring systems, SCADA platforms, and digital tools increasingly automate these processes, enabling early alerts and prioritized interventions.
A revealing KPI for maintenance maturity is the ratio of corrective actions versus total maintenance tasks. A high number of corrective interventions often indicates insufficient planning or poor implementation of preventive strategies.
Leading O&M companies aim for condition-based maintenance models, using system data and fault histories to predict and prevent failures. Reducing unplanned interventions cuts operating costs and enhances production stability.
For companies managing large portfolios—often spread across different regions or countries—it’s common to track staff productivity: number of plants or megawatts managed per technician, average time spent per asset, number of incidents resolved per team, etc.
Another widely used metric is the O&M cost per maintained megawatt, especially relevant in contract negotiations or competitive tenders. This value must balance direct costs (staff, spare parts, logistics) with actual results (PR, availability, SLA compliance), as a low cost does not always mean efficient service.
KPIs shouldn’t be limited to technical or financial metrics. In O&M—especially at utility scale—workplace safety and regulatory compliance are also essential.
Indicators may include the number of safety incidents, hours of training delivered, completion of scheduled inspections, or internal audit scores. These KPIs reinforce a holistic view of asset management.
Some companies are also adopting sustainability-related KPIs, such as the carbon footprint of operations, water use in cleaning processes, or waste management practices.
Once defined, KPIs need to be integrated into dashboard systems that provide clear, real-time visibility across plants, regions, or time periods. Web-based or mobile-accessible dashboards enable asset managers and owners to quickly assess portfolio status.
KPIs also enable internal and external benchmarking, identifying best practices, problem areas, and opportunities for improvement.
In some cases, KPIs are even linked to employee incentive programs, aligning technical and financial goals with team motivation.
KPIs are not an end in themselves—they are tools to drive continuous improvement. Their true value emerges when embedded into an organizational culture focused on analysis, transparency, and action. It’s not just about measuring—it’s about understanding, communicating, and acting.
As the global solar sector faces the challenge of operating and maintaining hundreds of gigawatts of capacity, the O&M companies that measure better, respond faster, and optimize smarter will be the ones that lead the way. KPIs, when used effectively, are the roadmap to that destination. .